Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics ; 15(1):143-145, 2022.
Article in English | Academic Search Complete | ID: covidwho-1731722
2.
4.
Ethics Inf Technol ; 23(3): 285-294, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-891267

ABSTRACT

There is growing interest in contact tracing apps (CT apps) for pandemic management. It is crucial to consider ethical requirements before, while, and after implementing such apps. In this paper, we illustrate the complexity and multiplicity of the ethical considerations by presenting an ethical framework for a responsible design and implementation of CT apps. Using this framework as a starting point, we briefly highlight the interconnection of social and political contexts, available measures of pandemic management, and a multi-layer assessment of CT apps. We will discuss some trade-offs that arise from this perspective. We then suggest that public trust is of major importance for population uptake of contact tracing apps. Hasty, ill-prepared or badly communicated implementations of CT apps will likely undermine public trust, and as such, risk impeding general effectiveness.

5.
J Bioeth Inq ; 17(4): 829-834, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-728260

ABSTRACT

Debates about effective responses to the COVID-19 pandemic have emphasized the paramount importance of digital tracing technology in suppressing the disease. So far, discussions about the ethics of this technology have focused on privacy concerns, efficacy, and uptake. However, important issues regarding power imbalances and vulnerability also warrant attention. As demonstrated in other forms of digital surveillance, vulnerable subpopulations pay a higher price for surveillance measures. There is reason to worry that some types of COVID-19 technology might lead to the employment of disproportionate profiling, policing, and criminalization of marginalized groups. It is, thus, of crucial importance to interrogate vulnerability in COVID-19 apps and ensure that the development, implementation, and data use of this surveillance technology avoids exacerbating vulnerability and the risk of harm to surveilled subpopulations, while maintaining the benefits of data collection across the whole population. This paper outlines the major challenges and a set of values that should be taken into account when implementing disease surveillance technology in the pandemic response.


Subject(s)
Digital Technology , Pandemics , Population Surveillance , Racial Groups , COVID-19 , Health Status Disparities , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Social Marginalization , Technology
6.
J Bioeth Inq ; 17(4): 823-827, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-728236

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic presents unprecedented challenges to public health decision-making. Specifically, the lack of evidence and the urgency with which a response is called for, raise the ethical challenge of assessing how much (and what kind of) evidence is required for the justification of interventions in response to the various threats we face. Here we discuss the intervention of introducing technology that aims to trace and alert contacts of infected persons-contact tracing (CT) technology. Determining whether such an intervention is proportional is complicated by complex trade-offs and feedback loops. We suggest that the resulting uncertainties necessitate a precautionary approach. On the one hand, precautionary reasons support CT technology as a means to contribute to the prevention of harms caused by alternative interventions, or COVID-19 itself. On the other hand, however, both the extent to which such technology itself present risks of serious harm, as well as its effectiveness, remain unclear. We therefore argue that a precautionary approach should put reversibility of CT technology at the forefront. We outline several practical implications.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/transmission , Contact Tracing/methods , Mobile Applications , Humans , Pandemics , Public Health , Risk Assessment , SARS-CoV-2 , Uncertainty
7.
Gesundheitswesen ; 82(6): 507-513, 2020 Jun.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-623537

ABSTRACT

In this paper we describe the process and content of our ad hoc public health ethics consultation for a Bavarian health authority in relation to Covid-19.


Subject(s)
Ethics Consultation , Pandemics/ethics , Public Health , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections , Germany , Humans , Pneumonia, Viral , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL